HR Intern
This is a full-time, on-site HR Intern role at Specular Business Services in Varanasi. The role involves supporting HR policy implementation, employee benefits design, and personnel management. Candidates should have a foundational understanding of HR principles and strong communication skills. It is an entry-level position suitable for those pursuing a degree in HR or business administration.
50k new jobs listed every day. Install TAL to find more jobs like this.
Experience
0-0 years
Function
Human Resources
Work mode
Onsite, India
Company
Tier 2
What you will work on
This is a full-time, on-site HR Intern role at Specular Business Services in Varanasi. The role involves supporting HR policy implementation, employee benefits design, and personnel management. Candidates should have a foundational understanding of HR principles and strong communication skills. It is an entry-level position suitable for those pursuing a degree in HR or business administration.
TAL's take
Entry-level intern role at a small/unfamiliar company with limited growth and unclear scope.
Clear and coherent role definition for an HR internship, though limited in technical complexity.
Must haves
- Knowledge and understanding of HR and Personnel Management principles
- Experience or interest in HR Management and implementing HR Policies
- Familiarity with Employee Benefits design and administration
- Organizational, communication, and interpersonal skills
- Ability to work collaboratively in a team-oriented environment
About the company
unfamiliar company, default mid-tier
Posts mentioning Specular Business Services
Seculars are voting for whom?
In current scenario, it is pretty evident that the whole election is based on religion and caste from all the parties. Everyone is catering to some certain segment and sticking to it. They won't even care if that statement will hurt the non-voters or not. Parties and their voters are like this : Congress: Non-Hindus ( Mostly Muslims) & backward castes of our society ( mostly the ones who enjoy reservation) BJP : Hindus & NRI's Interestingly, no one caters to Sikh community. Congress is aware of that after 1984 and BJP because of Khalistan and farm laws. Now fundamentally, the voter will choose the party which will benefit him/her. They feel safer under that regime. Like, there are many videos surfacing of Muslims claiming to break down Ram Mandir if Congress wins and in same manner, many videos coming in of Hindus taking over Kashi & Mathura temples if BJP stays in power. And I know none of them is going to happen. Now what I want to ask is how does a secular person reacts to this? And please don't say only BJP is fuelling hatred. If you feel so, then clearly you don't remember Congress's regime. Both the parties are playing dirty politics. Personally I feel BJP is less evil than Congress because it still remains patriotic while making decisions but Congress can sell their soul to cater their voters.
Supreme Court Upholds 1976 Preamble Amendments
- The Supreme Court dismissed pleas challenging the 1976 amendment adding 'socialist', 'secular', and 'integrity' to the Preamble. - The court affirmed Parliament's power to amend the Constitution, including the Preamble. - The verdict emphasized that these terms have become integral to India's constitutional ethos. Source: [Ndtv](https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/sc-dismisses-plea-against-socialist-secular-in-constitutions-preamble-7103099), [Nd News Express](https://www.ndnewsexpress.com/supreme-court-dismisses-plea-against-socialist-secular-in-constitutions-preamble/), [Abp News](https://news.abplive.com/explainers/why-supreme-court-refused-to-delete-secularism-socialism-from-preamble-1733764)
What kind of secularism is this?
Bangalore guy beaten up by 5 people because he was playing Hanuman Chalisa in his shop and these guys felt disrespected as the azaan was also being played in mosque at that time. What kind of secular culture is this? Is there some specific rule that you can't play anything else while the azaan is going on? And for one instance, I will go ahead and say, maybe they may have felt disrespected, they could have asked him to reduce the voice nicely. How did it reach to violence? Can't a man peacefully listen to something in his own property?