Responsabile delle relazioni
BOF Pay is seeking a Relationship Manager to handle corporate and institutional clients within its payment and FX infrastructure business. You will be responsible for managing client portfolios, identifying cross-sell opportunities, and ensuring service excellence. The ideal candidate has experience in transaction banking and deep knowledge of payment flows and AML compliance. This role offers exposure to institutional FX at scale within a rapidly growing team.
50k new jobs listed every day. Install TAL to find more jobs like this.
Experience
3-6 years
Function
Business Development
Work mode
Onsite, United Arab Emirates
Company
Tier 2
What you will work on
BOF Pay is seeking a Relationship Manager to handle corporate and institutional clients within its payment and FX infrastructure business. You will be responsible for managing client portfolios, identifying cross-sell opportunities, and ensuring service excellence. The ideal candidate has experience in transaction banking and deep knowledge of payment flows and AML compliance. This role offers exposure to institutional FX at scale within a rapidly growing team.
TAL's take
Clear, well-defined role in the payments sector with specific experience requirements, though the company brand is not globally established.
The JD is crisp, defining specific responsibilities, requirements, and domain focus for a relationship management role.
Must haves
- Bachelor's degree in Finance, Business, or related discipline
- 3–6 years of experience in relationship management
- Strong understanding of cross-border payments, SWIFT, and FX products
- Proven ability to manage and grow B2B client relationships
- Familiarity with compliance and AML frameworks
Tools and skills
Nice to have: arabic.
About the company
Unfamiliar company in the payments domain, classified as mid-stage/tier 2 by default.
Posts mentioning BOF Pay
Opposition Plans No-Confidence Motion Against Rajya Sabha Chairman
- The Opposition INDIA bloc is set to move a no-confidence motion against Rajya Sabha Chairman and Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar. - All parties in the INDIA bloc, including TMC, AAP, and SP, have signed the motion, citing frequent confrontations with Opposition MPs. - The motion will be moved under Article 67(B) of the Constitution. More details to follow. Source: [Times Now News](https://www.timesnownews.com/india/india-bloc-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-vp-jagdeep-dhankhar-in-rajya-sabha-article-116139631), [Abp News](https://news.abplive.com/news/india/parliament-winter-session-2024-opposition-plans-to-bring-no-confidence-motion-against-rajya-sabha-chairman-jagdeep-dhankhar-1736569)
Angel Tax Abolished in Budget 2024: What You Need to Know
- The angel tax, introduced in 2012 to curb money laundering through startup investments, has been scrapped as announced by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on July 23, 2024. - Angel Tax, under Section 56 (2) (vii b) of the Income Tax Act, taxed funds raised by startups from angel investors exceeding the fair market value of the company, often at around 31 percent. - Startups have long criticized the tax as impractical and excessively harsh, with many receiving tax notices years after raising funds, sometimes owing more in taxes and fees than the original investment. - Initially, the tax applied only to domestic investors but was later extended to foreign investors as well. Exemptions existed for DPIIT-registered startups, but only if certified by the Inter-Ministerial Board, a status achieved by less than 1 percent of registered startups. - The removal of the angel tax is expected to bring significant relief to startups and their investors, fostering a more favorable environment for innovation and growth in the startup ecosystem. Source: Moneycontrol
X Challenges India's Content-Blocking Laws in Court
- X, formerly Twitter, has filed a petition in the Karnataka high court against the Indian government's use of Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act. - The company argues that this section sets up an illegal parallel content-blocking process and violates the Supreme Court's 2015 Shreya Singhal judgment. - X contends that government authorities misuse this section to bypass Section 69A safeguards and arbitrarily censor online content. - The company seeks protection from government actions that do not comply with Section 69A and opposes the Sahyog portal, calling it a 'Censorship Portal.' - X claims that the misuse of Section 79(3)(b) undermines established legal procedures and creates a censorship system without checks and balances. Source: [Hindustan Times](https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/x-approaches-hc-over-centre-using-it-act-to-block-content-101742412191170.html), [Hindustan Times](https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/x-sues-govt-over-use-of-it-act-to-block-content-101742440040189.html)