WFO is better for a newbie employee.(1-2 yr work ex)

WFH is better, given you are willing to work, learn. I am 1 yr experienced, worked hard from home[hustled], got laid off and got 6 new offers within 1.5 months bcz my resume became good + my manager and colleague helped me with referral

Depends on company, but I agree wfo is better for freshers, not just to learn skills but also soft skills.

This depends on person to person. You could either be abusing WFH freedom or using the extra time to upskill & improve yourself.

Wfh has been a disaster for me...Productivity all time low

For a junior person: Passive learning is a thing. If your colleagues are actually nice then WFO can be really good onboarding experience. Just hearing from colleagues discussing problems they are working its just speeds up the learning process.

I know these days you can get good answers for long form questions from ChatGPT however you need that curiosity in you to ask the questions in the first place. Hence the passive learning.

No.. wfo is not better. Its a paradox of value You can be at the office 24×7.. will not add any addtional value than what you will get in the projext you are working. The leqrning will be the same whether in office or at home. The chances of promotion or better projects come along with time.. your performance and the economic conditions at that moment.. so why waste time by going to office ? When you benefit nore by n9t being there?

Only worth it if you're interested in the work. I turned my whole life around via WFH first job.

I'll prefer WFO if my office is in the same city.

Depends on the company - if you're not learning much on the job it's kinda pointless just being stuck in office. Might as well use the time to learn elsewhere or search for a new job.

Moot point. Everyone is different and will work better in different environment