Only in India
Only in India will someone speaking scientific fact and sense against age-old myths can get banned by court orders on X
Talking product sense with Ridhi
9 min AI interview5 questions
He is not balanced. He extrapolates medical terminology to prove his point. There are frauds everywhere but he is no saint either. Good riddiance
If you're using any Himalaya or patanjali product then you need to immediately stop and throw that trash out.
My friend, you will be surprised to know the number of educated people that believe in and support those products and methodologies.
This also reminds me of Aman Gupta from Shark Tank openly advertising his belief in such companies and investing in them.
That's why I hate people. Anything that is not peer reviewed by multiple parties and reproducible is sudo-science aka bakwas
The Liver Doc is biased. I won't say Liver Doc's points are baseless but he is prejudiced.
- He used scientific articles to prove that Ayurvedic treatment is shit. People may get liver failure if they ingest too many shitty ayurvedic medicines. I agree, totally.
- When I replied to one of his tweets, that a person had liver failure after ingesting so called 'scientifically proven' allopathic medicines, he blocked me. Why so, if he is spreading good message to the humanity?
- I agree there are numerous examples where ayurvedic treatments caused liver failure problems. But, so do people get liver problems after having 'scientifically proven' treatments.
- His usage of words is not good. He will verbally abuse anyone who say anything to defend Ayurvedic treatment.
Hahaha, he refused to accept that medicinal herbs exists. He wanted everyone to refuse ayurveda and use only allopathy. He blocked everyone who said both are good. Refusing to acknowledge the evidence of ayurveda is totally opposite of science. Good to see him temporarily blocked
You're 100% incorrect about everything you said. He has in fact agreed about the potential vitality & medicinal nature of herbs used in Ayurveda, but that does not absolve the mountain of evidence against its misuse & toxicology.
Please don't make baseless claims, if you're not in the know about the subject matter.
You are making baseless claims here. He didn’t block Ayurveda supporting guys. He used to block only the abusive folks. I myself had opposed him many times.
The judiciary would stand with Ayurveda companies itself, irrespective of how fatal they may be 🥲
Yeah, that’s the problem of mentality in this country.
This guy was a big threat to all the companies that need to peddle age-old myths and lies to sell products. Sadly, we have a majority of people that believe in those myths and lies.
Count one myth first.
One of the many reasons why we don’t progress. Not surprised at all. This old age mentality is not going to change anytime soon.
At the moment .. neutral view .. He did raise very valid points in his tweets and tried to raise awareness but somewhere soon started taking things for granted and came up with many more theories without substantial research ( just pointing to a random paper does not help) Ayurveda is good and yes many fake products are also there but just to put it all down because some do not work is not fair .. Excepted him to disapprove scientifically . But anyway good this is happening will help in filtering the bad elements out .
Learning is one should not paint anything black and white without proofs .
Modi hain to mumkin hain
This is first rate clownery, if ever there was one. The complainant is Himalaya Wellness, specifically Meraj Alim Manal, Syed Farooq Ahmed. The decision was made by the hon'ble judiciary. Has this space been infiltrated by eNREGA pidis?
Why do you have to mention names of the founders? What are you trying to imply?