Technology Risk Business Partner
The Group Technology Risk Business Partner acts as a second-line of defense, providing oversight and advisory on technology risk for FNZ's global wealth platform. The role involves challenging senior leadership, managing third-party and operational resilience risks, and governing AI technology adoption. Candidates must have extensive experience in regulated financial services and a deep understanding of risk frameworks. This position provides critical insights to executive stakeholders and the Board regarding material technology risks.
50k new jobs listed every day. Install TAL to find more jobs like this.
Experience
Experience not specified
Function
Consulting
Work mode
Onsite, India
Company
Tier 2
What you will work on
The Group Technology Risk Business Partner acts as a second-line of defense, providing oversight and advisory on technology risk for FNZ's global wealth platform. The role involves challenging senior leadership, managing third-party and operational resilience risks, and governing AI technology adoption. Candidates must have extensive experience in regulated financial services and a deep understanding of risk frameworks. This position provides critical insights to executive stakeholders and the Board regarding material technology risks.
TAL's take
Strong role in a reputable global fintech platform, focusing on high-impact second-line risk governance, though the JD lacks explicit seniority and YOE details.
Clear and coherent responsibilities defining a second-line risk advisory role, though slightly broad in scope across multiple risk domains.
Must haves
- Extensive experience in technology or information risk
- Experience in complex, regulated financial services organizations
- Proven ability to provide credible challenge to senior stakeholders
- Understanding of resilience, security, and third-party risk
- Experience operating in a three lines of defence model
- Experience assessing and governing AI use cases
Tools and skills
About the company
Established global fintech wealth management platform provider with significant assets under management but not a Tier-1 tech giant.
Posts mentioning FNZ Group
Job Offer's Confusion
Got an offer from FNZ (Fintech, Wealth Management) for 12 LPA fixed, 5 days WFO for 3 months then 3 days WFO, free food & cab. Concern: It's 22km from home & DOJ is April 13. Also have Persistent offering 12 LPA fixed, food, 2 days WFO & <1km distance. Client is Microsoft, but DOJ is April 7 (HR is super strict). NIQ, Deloitte, NICE interviews are lined up next week, but no guarantees. Tech stack: .NET, Azure, Angular, 3.5 YOE. My target was to crack 15 LPA hybrid & <10km. Your thoughts
Switch Suggestion
Is FNZ good to join?
Principal Engineer (Backend/.NET) choosing between FNZ, Autodesk, and MedMetrix — looking for engineering + career advice
Hi everyone, I’m a Principal Software Engineer (backend, .NET, AWS) currently working in India (~38.8 LPA fixed + 10% bonus), and I’m evaluating a few opportunities. I’d really appreciate insights specifically from an engineering, system design, and long-term career growth perspective. Here are the options: --- MedMetrix - ₹58 LPA fixed - EST shift (5:30 PM – 2:30 AM IST) - From what I understand, work may be more service/operations-heavy --- Autodesk - ₹40 LPA fixed + 10% bonus - ~$30K stock over 4 years + ₹3L joining bonus - Strong product company, but role is Senior Software Engineer (down-level from my current Principal role) --- FNZ (in process) - Expecting ~₹55L+ - FinTech domain (wealth management platform) - Trying to understand if the work is core product engineering vs client delivery --- What I care about: - Backend/system design challenges at scale - Clean architecture, distributed systems exposure - Long-term growth (next 3–5 years) - Avoiding roles that are mostly operational/support-heavy --- Questions: 1. How is the engineering quality and system design exposure at FNZ vs Autodesk? 2. Does FNZ involve significant client-driven/customization work, or is it core product engineering? 3. For someone already at Principal level, is taking a down-level role (Autodesk SSE) worth it for brand + learning? 4. How bad is long-term night shift (MedMetrix) from your experience in terms of productivity and growth? 5. Which option would set me up better for high-quality backend/product roles in the future? --- Would really appreciate insights from people who have worked in these companies or similar environments. Thanks!