Responsabile del rischio
BOF Prime is hiring a Risk Manager to design and maintain the risk management framework for their wealth and financial services division. The role involves monitoring portfolio exposures, conducting stress tests, and ensuring regulatory compliance with bodies like the DFSA or SEC. Candidates need 4-7 years of experience in financial risk management and proficiency in tools like VaR and Monte Carlo. The position offers high visibility and direct interaction with senior leadership.
50k new jobs listed every day. Install TAL to find more jobs like this.
Experience
4-7 years
Function
Finance
Work mode
Onsite, UAE
Company
Tier 2
What you will work on
BOF Prime is hiring a Risk Manager to design and maintain the risk management framework for their wealth and financial services division. The role involves monitoring portfolio exposures, conducting stress tests, and ensuring regulatory compliance with bodies like the DFSA or SEC. Candidates need 4-7 years of experience in financial risk management and proficiency in tools like VaR and Monte Carlo. The position offers high visibility and direct interaction with senior leadership.
TAL's take
Specialized financial role in a boutique firm with clearly defined responsibilities and regulatory scope.
Clear and well-defined responsibilities, specific technical requirements, and target experience profile.
Must haves
- Bachelor's degree in Finance, Risk Management, Mathematics, or related field
- 4–7 years of experience in risk management
- Understanding of HNWI product offerings
- Proficiency in risk modelling tools and methodologies
- Knowledge of DFSA, SEC, or equivalent regulatory frameworks
Tools and skills
Nice to have: frm certification, prm certification.
About the company
Unfamiliar company, default mid-tier for a boutique wealth management firm.
Posts mentioning BOF Prime
Opposition Plans No-Confidence Motion Against Rajya Sabha Chairman
- The Opposition INDIA bloc is set to move a no-confidence motion against Rajya Sabha Chairman and Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar. - All parties in the INDIA bloc, including TMC, AAP, and SP, have signed the motion, citing frequent confrontations with Opposition MPs. - The motion will be moved under Article 67(B) of the Constitution. More details to follow. Source: [Times Now News](https://www.timesnownews.com/india/india-bloc-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-vp-jagdeep-dhankhar-in-rajya-sabha-article-116139631), [Abp News](https://news.abplive.com/news/india/parliament-winter-session-2024-opposition-plans-to-bring-no-confidence-motion-against-rajya-sabha-chairman-jagdeep-dhankhar-1736569)
Angel Tax Abolished in Budget 2024: What You Need to Know
- The angel tax, introduced in 2012 to curb money laundering through startup investments, has been scrapped as announced by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on July 23, 2024. - Angel Tax, under Section 56 (2) (vii b) of the Income Tax Act, taxed funds raised by startups from angel investors exceeding the fair market value of the company, often at around 31 percent. - Startups have long criticized the tax as impractical and excessively harsh, with many receiving tax notices years after raising funds, sometimes owing more in taxes and fees than the original investment. - Initially, the tax applied only to domestic investors but was later extended to foreign investors as well. Exemptions existed for DPIIT-registered startups, but only if certified by the Inter-Ministerial Board, a status achieved by less than 1 percent of registered startups. - The removal of the angel tax is expected to bring significant relief to startups and their investors, fostering a more favorable environment for innovation and growth in the startup ecosystem. Source: Moneycontrol
X Challenges India's Content-Blocking Laws in Court
- X, formerly Twitter, has filed a petition in the Karnataka high court against the Indian government's use of Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act. - The company argues that this section sets up an illegal parallel content-blocking process and violates the Supreme Court's 2015 Shreya Singhal judgment. - X contends that government authorities misuse this section to bypass Section 69A safeguards and arbitrarily censor online content. - The company seeks protection from government actions that do not comply with Section 69A and opposes the Sahyog portal, calling it a 'Censorship Portal.' - X claims that the misuse of Section 79(3)(b) undermines established legal procedures and creates a censorship system without checks and balances. Source: [Hindustan Times](https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/x-approaches-hc-over-centre-using-it-act-to-block-content-101742412191170.html), [Hindustan Times](https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/x-sues-govt-over-use-of-it-act-to-block-content-101742440040189.html)