ENGINEER, QUALITY ENGINEERING
Talent People Development is hiring a Quality Engineer to monitor performance and resolve quality issues. The role involves analyzing trends, maintaining inspection documentation, and conducting root cause investigations. Candidates must have experience with ISO9001/ISO45001 standards and quality management. This is an onsite position focused on ensuring high manufacturing and precision engineering standards.
50k new jobs listed every day. Install TAL to find more jobs like this.

Experience
5+ years
Function
Quality Assurance
Work mode
Onsite, Singapore
Company
Tier 3
What you will work on
Talent People Development is hiring a Quality Engineer to monitor performance and resolve quality issues. The role involves analyzing trends, maintaining inspection documentation, and conducting root cause investigations. Candidates must have experience with ISO9001/ISO45001 standards and quality management. This is an onsite position focused on ensuring high manufacturing and precision engineering standards.
TAL's take
Standardized quality engineering role within an agency, lacking specific product context or high-growth indicators.
The JD clearly outlines the functional responsibilities, required systems, and experience level for a typical quality engineering position.
Must haves
- Diploma or Degree in Mechanical, Manufacturing, or Precision Engineering
- At least 5 years experience in Quality Control
- 2 years hands-on experience with ISO9001 / ISO45001
- Strong analytical and problem-solving skills
Tools and skills
About the company
Small staffing/recruitment firm indicated by the agency license number.
Posts mentioning Talent People Development
Here is an opportunity to hire people who built features that Zomato & Swiggy copied!
Sorry for the clickbait, but we did build some cool stuff in food tech startup. But as it is often with startups, my company recently shut shop. And there is some great talent you can hire immediately. Checkout the LinkedIn post attached below.
Why nation fall
What is an extractive economy? An extractive economy is one where a small elite holds all the power political and economic and uses it to serve themselves. These people don’t build, they extract. Resources, labor, wealth, and even hope from the masses. The rest of the population gets scraps, if anything. The institutions are built not to include, but to exclude. Over time, this creates deep poverty, stagnation, and chaos. It suppresses talent, kills opportunity, and chokes any chance of a better future for the majority. And here’s where it gets darker. In extractive regimes, when governments fail to provide the basics like employment, clean water, good education, accessible healthcare then they don’t admit failure. They don’t reflect. Instead, they often manufacture or magnify external threats. It becomes their distraction weapon. Because when a nation is “on the brink of war,” suddenly your unemployment doesn’t feel that important. Your hunger, your lack of income, your unfulfilled dreams they all shrink in comparison to the idea that “our very nation is under threat.” It works like magic. And I’ve started noticing a pattern in our country. September 18, 2016 – Uri Attack Terrorists entered an Indian army camp and carried out a brutal attack. No one ever figured out how they got in, how they planned it, how it slipped through intelligence cracks. But right after that came the surgical strike, publicized to the point where it felt like Modi ji himself had led the team across the border. Six months later, UP elections happened. The BJP won with overwhelming support. The narrative was simple: “Yeh naya Hindustan hai, ghar mein ghus ke maarta hai.” “Modi hai toh mumkin hai.” ⸻ February 14, 2019 – Pulwama Attack 250 kg of RDX entered Indian soil. How? Nobody knows. A civilian car got near a military convoy and exploded. Again—no clear answers. But soon after came the Balakot air strike. Patriotism peaked. The government took center stage, framing the military operation as its own victory. May 2019 – General Elections. Guess what? BJP swept again. Why? Because Modi had “done the airstrike,” and Abhinandan was brought back like a national trophy. ⸻ March 2020 – COVID Crisis The country was bleeding. People dying in corridors. No hospital beds. No oxygen. Crematoriums overloaded. But the headlines? Sushant Singh Rajput’s suicide. Suddenly, we were all CBI agents. Rhea Chakraborty became the national villain. Weeks passed. Anger diverted. Public pain diluted. Final verdict? Who knows. But the damage was done—distraction achieved. ⸻ June 2020 – Galwan Valley Clash COVID deaths were rising. The system was crumbling. But suddenly, China was at the gates. Instead of focusing on saving lives, we were busy banning TikTok. Talking about boycotting Chinese goods. And just when everything felt like it was falling apart… Rafale jets arrived. News channels ran 24/7 coverage of fighter jets like they were Avengers joining the battlefield. Meanwhile, people were still dying without oxygen in hospitals. ⸻ Now again, another terrorist incident. Possibly a post-raid misreported as a terror attack. But the media is spinning it hard. Visuals. Footage. Narratives. Almost as if the intent is not to inform, but to influence. ⸻ Ram Mandir Timing The Ram Mandir verdict, unresolved for 30 years, suddenly got closure just before the 2024 elections. Fine. But what I can’t understand is why the inauguration happened before the temple was even completed. Shankaracharyas themselves said it’s inauspicious to do that. But it happened anyway. Just in time to stoke emotions ahead of the vote. ⸻ I’m not claiming anything. I’m not saying it’s all orchestrated. I don’t have the proof. But I see the pattern. Again and again. National tragedies turned into nationalist campaigns. Failures turned into war cries. Real questions silenced under the weight of “enemy threats.” Why is it that every time we’re close to an election, a tragedy happens, followed by a military response, and then a victory lap? I don’t know the answer. I’m just a guy observing. But I can’t unsee it now.
something people rarely admit - Social proof runs the hiring market
Yep. Let that sink in for a bit. The "Open to Work" badge never got the respect it deserved. Facts as Facts. Some Recruiters & Hiring Managers saw it and thought.. - Nice - they're available : Lets capitalise - Okay - they're available : Lets see where they fit Others? They judged it. Hard. Period. Point is.. The moment you LOOK like you're struggling, people assume you are the problem. If you are at the end of the rope... No job in months. Savings running dry. Rejections piling up You need to signal to the market that you need a job NOW. What do you do? A "Desperate as Hell" badge? (clearly the "Open to Work" badge did not work) A cry-for-help LinkedIn post with CFBR comments? A profile banner that says "Will work for Food" or "fati padi hai.."? Guess what happens next?? You could be the most skilled candidate in the world or a rather decent one at your craft and domain, but if you are out here making public SOS signals.. People weirdly process them as.. - Wait… why hasn't anyone hired them yet? - Maybe they're not as good as they say - Why do they have to advertise it? Good people don't need to - They must be struggling if they're making it that obvious - If they were truly talented, they wouldn’t be in this position Now, instead of getting more interviews, you've tanked your own value Because hiring is NOT about who needs it the most It's about who looks like they DON'T need it at all Because in hiring, being too available makes you look LESS valuable You need a job - but you can’t look like you need one That's how messed up this game is If you're unemployed but confident? People are skeptical If you're unemployed and desperate? You're radioactive & a hot mess If you're still employed? Now... suddenly, everyone wants to talk You need to be desperate enough to keep applying, but not desperate enough that people can see it. You have to struggle in silence because the moment the market SEES you struggling, it assumes you are the problem Know why?? Because hiring is built on supply and demand, not fairness I'm saying it is what it is .. unfortunately. On the flip side, I know people who have been out of work for 8 months and still refuse to adjust. - I only want remote - I'm not taking a pay cut - I won't move domain let's get this straight - You're losing the game but refuse to change your playbook. You are drowning but won't grab onto anything that isn't their dream job. How smart 🤦♂️ Remember this : The system selectively rewards talent It rewards the people who know how to be wanted If you don't learn how to manufacture demand for yourself, you will always be at the mercy of those who do Now.. lets talk about badge color and badge ideas. Who's up?