Operations Support Officer - UAE National

Why nation fall

What is an extractive economy? An extractive economy is one where a small elite holds all the power political and economic and uses it to serve themselves. These people don’t build, they extract. Resources, labor, wealth, and even hope from the masses. The rest of the population gets scraps, if anything. The institutions are built not to include, but to exclude. Over time, this creates deep poverty, stagnation, and chaos. It suppresses talent, kills opportunity, and chokes any chance of a better future for the majority. And here’s where it gets darker. In extractive regimes, when governments fail to provide the basics like employment, clean water, good education, accessible healthcare then they don’t admit failure. They don’t reflect. Instead, they often manufacture or magnify external threats. It becomes their distraction weapon. Because when a nation is “on the brink of war,” suddenly your unemployment doesn’t feel that important. Your hunger, your lack of income, your unfulfilled dreams they all shrink in comparison to the idea that “our very nation is under threat.” It works like magic. And I’ve started noticing a pattern in our country. September 18, 2016 – Uri Attack Terrorists entered an Indian army camp and carried out a brutal attack. No one ever figured out how they got in, how they planned it, how it slipped through intelligence cracks. But right after that came the surgical strike, publicized to the point where it felt like Modi ji himself had led the team across the border. Six months later, UP elections happened. The BJP won with overwhelming support. The narrative was simple: “Yeh naya Hindustan hai, ghar mein ghus ke maarta hai.” “Modi hai toh mumkin hai.” ⸻ February 14, 2019 – Pulwama Attack 250 kg of RDX entered Indian soil. How? Nobody knows. A civilian car got near a military convoy and exploded. Again—no clear answers. But soon after came the Balakot air strike. Patriotism peaked. The government took center stage, framing the military operation as its own victory. May 2019 – General Elections. Guess what? BJP swept again. Why? Because Modi had “done the airstrike,” and Abhinandan was brought back like a national trophy. ⸻ March 2020 – COVID Crisis The country was bleeding. People dying in corridors. No hospital beds. No oxygen. Crematoriums overloaded. But the headlines? Sushant Singh Rajput’s suicide. Suddenly, we were all CBI agents. Rhea Chakraborty became the national villain. Weeks passed. Anger diverted. Public pain diluted. Final verdict? Who knows. But the damage was done—distraction achieved. ⸻ June 2020 – Galwan Valley Clash COVID deaths were rising. The system was crumbling. But suddenly, China was at the gates. Instead of focusing on saving lives, we were busy banning TikTok. Talking about boycotting Chinese goods. And just when everything felt like it was falling apart… Rafale jets arrived. News channels ran 24/7 coverage of fighter jets like they were Avengers joining the battlefield. Meanwhile, people were still dying without oxygen in hospitals. ⸻ Now again, another terrorist incident. Possibly a post-raid misreported as a terror attack. But the media is spinning it hard. Visuals. Footage. Narratives. Almost as if the intent is not to inform, but to influence. ⸻ Ram Mandir Timing The Ram Mandir verdict, unresolved for 30 years, suddenly got closure just before the 2024 elections. Fine. But what I can’t understand is why the inauguration happened before the temple was even completed. Shankaracharyas themselves said it’s inauspicious to do that. But it happened anyway. Just in time to stoke emotions ahead of the vote. ⸻ I’m not claiming anything. I’m not saying it’s all orchestrated. I don’t have the proof. But I see the pattern. Again and again. National tragedies turned into nationalist campaigns. Failures turned into war cries. Real questions silenced under the weight of “enemy threats.” Why is it that every time we’re close to an election, a tragedy happens, followed by a military response, and then a victory lap? I don’t know the answer. I’m just a guy observing. But I can’t unsee it now.

Today I found out about China's teardown and reverse engineering culture

If you look through recent headlines and viral tech forums, you can't miss the flood of teardown analysis reports being shared and dissected. Companies like TechInsights, Munro & Associates, iFixit, MarkLines, and even specialist Chinese platforms such as 52audio and Chongdiantou are producing deep, detailed reports that tear open the most hyped products—think iPhones, Teslas, Huawei Mate phones, or Xiaomi EVs—revealing their inner secrets for everyone to study. These teardowns aren't just about satisfying geek curiosity (though, let's admit, that’s a huge part—they're the ultimate engineering ASMR!). They're about unleashing a wave of competitive research, strategic sourcing, and hands-on education that's changing industries. China has transformed teardown analysis and reverse engineering from niche industry practice into a comprehensive national strategy embedded across manufacturing, R&D, and industrial policy. Major Chinese Teardown Platforms & Reports: 1) 52audio (我爱音频网): Over 365 teardown reports on audio products, smartwatches, wearables; comprehensive TWS earphone ecosystem analysis 2) Chongdiantou (充电头网): Specializes in GaN chargers, power stations, charging technology teardowns 3) MarkLines China: Automotive EV teardowns including BYD, Xiaomi SU7, Tesla analysis China's Strategic Reverse Engineering 1) Success Stories:High-Speed Rail (HSR): Reverse-engineered foreign rail technology, now world leader with 11,000+ km of track and global exports 2) Aerospace: Systematic reverse engineering of Soviet, European, American aircraft designs (J-11, J-15, J-16, J-20, J-35) 3) Semiconductors: Despite sanctions, achieved 7nm chip manufacturing through systematic teardown and reverse engineering efforts 4) EV Technology: BYD, Xiaomi leveraging teardown insights to create competitive domestic platforms What’s Inside a Viral Teardown Report? Imagine a document packed with: High-resolution photos of every layer, chip, and connector.Circuit diagrams painstakingly reconstructed from physical parts. Bills of materials (BoMs) and supplier lists—sometimes tracking origins to single factories. Physical measurements, manufacturing techniques, cost modeling, and even step-by-step chip microscopy.For example, the TechInsights teardown of the Huawei Mate 60 Pro dropped like a bombshell by exposing China’s 7nm chip manufacturing breakthrough, directly challenging western tech sanctions. Similarly, Munro’s Tesla Cybertruck teardown made waves by revealing its gigacast frame and unique motor architecture—raising alarms and ambitions among rival automakers. How Can India Do It? Set Up Dedicated Teardown Labs: Use multidisciplinary teams to reverse engineer hot products across electronics, automotive, telecom, and energy sectors. Leverage Local Manufacturing Relationships: India’s position in global supply chains (think smartphone assembly, auto components) can be turned into unique teardown research opportunities. Document and Share: Build open-access repositories (think Indian iFixit or TechInsights) to democratize and crowdsource reverse engineering. Investigative Research: Partner with VCs, academic institutions, and industry bodies to commission teardowns that answer strategic questions—where is the secret sauce, and who holds the keys? Indian firms and engineers have all the technical talent, component access, and scale needed to join this league—whether for competitive intelligence, original R&D, or education. For every Indian engineer or entrepreneur who’s ever wondered “How does that work?”—grab a screwdriver and a microscope.

Waves of corporatisation in India

Corporatisation can be generally referred to as standardisation and formalisation of a business firm along the modern techno-industrial lines. This practice of corporatisation began in Britain during industrial revolution when big companies based on coal, iron and steam engine set up industries across England and there was a need for standardisation of business operation of a particular company all across the country. This later spread to United States (beginning from Cotton textiles and plantation firm having large holdings), France and Germany during 19th century. As far as India is concerned, it has witnessed four waves of corporatisation First wave of corporatisation was based on Kolkata beginning with East India Company, which gradually opened up for multiple English companies after 1858 GoI Act. Later on several companies of textiles, chemicals and heavy industries opened their offices in Kolkata, of whom many beginning to be owned by Indians too. Second wave of corporatisation began in Bombay Mumbai when Manchester based textiles companies opened up their head offices in Mumbai in purpose of handling export of raw cotton from Gujarat and Maharashtra and importing finished textiles from England through Mumbai port. Later on several Gujrati Marwari textile companies opened factories and offices in Mumbai. Corporatisation in Mumbai went for a long period of time I would say, even after independence. It benefitted from spread of communism in Bengal, which made Kolkata unattractive destination for investment, and LPG reforms, after which companies boomed in India who subsequently only found Mumbai as most suitable site for office. Third wave of corporatisation began in Delhi-NCR, Bangalore and Hyderabad coinciding with IT boom in India. Availability of talent pool became the biggest common factor triggering corporatisation in these three cities. We are currently in fourth wave of corporatisation which is not limited to handful of big cities. Corporate world also streching their roots to multiple cities like Chennai, Vishakhapatnam, Ahemdabad, Bhubaneswar, Indore, Jaipur, Lucknow etc as well. Companies are opening their offices in other cities as well for managing their operations in regional level. Several start-up companies are also emerging. In future companies likely to shift their peripheral operations involving technical staff in other cities and limit only managerial level tasks in respective offices in big cities.