Sr Manager Finance Data Analytics
Vertiv is seeking a Senior Manager to lead a finance data and AI analytics team in Pune. The role involves managing BI reporting, governing data products, and implementing AI/ML solutions for global finance stakeholders. You will be responsible for leading a team of four, establishing data governance, and automating manual finance workflows. Candidates should have extensive experience in analytics and leadership, with strong skills in SQL and cloud data platforms.
50k new jobs listed every day. Install TAL to find more jobs like this.

Experience
12-16 years
Function
Finance
Work mode
Onsite, India
Company
Tier 2
What you will work on
Vertiv is seeking a Senior Manager to lead a finance data and AI analytics team in Pune. The role involves managing BI reporting, governing data products, and implementing AI/ML solutions for global finance stakeholders. You will be responsible for leading a team of four, establishing data governance, and automating manual finance workflows. Candidates should have extensive experience in analytics and leadership, with strong skills in SQL and cloud data platforms.
TAL's take
Solid senior leadership role in a stable global company with clearly defined team management and strategic scope.
The JD clearly defines the team size, reporting lines, core responsibilities, and the specific domain of finance analytics.
Must haves
- Bachelor’s degree in engineering, Finance, Information Systems, or Data Analytics
- 12 to 16 years in analytics, data platforms, or BI
- Strong working knowledge of SQL, cloud data platforms, and BI tools
- Experience delivering analytics in a complex, multi-stakeholder environment
- Proven ability to lead teams and manage priorities
Tools and skills
Nice to have: ai, ml, llm.
About the company
Vertiv is an established global provider of critical digital infrastructure, fitting the criteria for a Tier 2 product company.
Posts mentioning Vertiv
Am I getting arrogant or thinking right?
So after building my venture for over six years, in January,22 I decided to move on and in Sept,22 I joined an early stage startup led by ex-CXO of a small vertical of Indian IT giant. i joined as early employee to lead product, but over time I have been moved across multiple things without my consent, but I continued doing in and out across as pre-sales, customer success and blah blah. Over the last 1 and half year, the company just got few clients with around total revenue of 15 Lakhs annual. On the sides, I started building my venture as well and built a small team of 4 people, launcjed the product and is doing good in terms of revenue. With the limited time I am able to give after spending 10+ hours doing nothing at my job, at my startup we have scaled well and are doong decent enough monthly revenue of around 6.5 Lakhs and are growing as well. Now, at the place where I work, few people including founder come and give me some gyaan but I don’t like it. Not because I don’t want to learns but because I feel these gyaans are one-sides and comes with limited view. IRL, I have executed better than what they are doing with a better capital efficiency and with very small team. I don’t like what they say. Am I getting arrigant or am I being selective to who do I want to learn from and what? I don’t want to turn arrogant and someone who miss staying grounded. In my venture I listen to my team, my people, my users and stay as much humble as possible, but when it come to my job place, I don’t like them. PS: I am not leaving the job because for the next 2-3 months, I don’t want to burden my company with my salary expense and also my marriage is scheduled so don’t want to eat my savings.
Generalists to specialists
MBA grads(3+ years of exp) who are yet to find their role/vertical/industry... What is your plan? When should one develop the 'expertise'?
Strange decision making at Pocket FM-layoffs coming!!!
Breaking (and honestly, heartbreaking): Pocket TV — the same charter that hit $20M ARR in just 6 months and was on the verge of profitability — has been shut down How do you even make sense of that? A vertical that scaled faster than anything else in the company, found amazing product-market fit, and was finally on the path to self-sustenance… gone overnight. People are saying it’s because of “focus” or “funding conditions.” But let’s be real — macro funding hasn’t changed in the last 6 months. What has changed is the internal dynamic at the top. Somewhere between chasing valuations and fighting over credit, the bigger picture seems to have completely disappeared. It’s wild to see how ego and dissonance between founders can burn down something that was actually working. The company once talked about being the “Netflix of audio,” but now it’s shutting every experiment that shows real potential — except one random vertical that no one internally even believes in. At this point, it’s not even about strategy. It’s about fragile egos, politics, and people forgetting why they started in the first place. Maybe that’s the real reason Pocket can’t become the Netflix of audio. Because as Reed Hastings said — Culture eats strategy for breakfast. And let’s be honest — there’s no culture left to eat anything