Recruitment Optics
Funny how in most orgs, Recruiters are rewarded for the churn they create. Every time a hire leaves, they get paid to fill the same role again. Why isn't anyone incentivizing them to solve the root problem? The way I see it ... Great recruiters prevent churn, bad ones profit from it
Talking product sense with Ridhi
9 min AI interview5 questions
recruiters have no control over people leaving the company. there is no way to incentivize them to prevent churn. Infact they have no control over people hiring. They just arrange for the interview between the ops team and the potential candidate. and follow up with the final hire untill he/she joins the company.
They are the corporate equivalent of lorry cleaners. how can one reward the cleaner for quicker delivery?
Read the sentence - it was calling out orgs. Not recruiters
Recruiter and HRBP are different roles in most companies, that's why
Competitive pay Supportive environment Growth roadmap Recognition Work/Life balance through better processes
I think this is doable by most companies to retain best employees and to upgrade average employees too.
Instead founders opt for Favouritism Blame games Unorganised operating processes Not delegating authority and decision making
Exploitation tactics. And it’s a common theme in Indian companies.