BouncySushi
BouncySushi

Not a single indian american tech CEO has issued statements supporting india over the past 2 weeks, & we feel proud for them. 😏

11d ago
Talking product sense with Ridhi
9 min AI interview5 questions
Round 1 by Grapevine
ZoomyMuffin
ZoomyMuffin

Do they have to keep issuing statements for proving their Indian-ness? Do we have to keep looking out for everyone's statements?

War Jeetni hai ya Munim Munim khelna hai?

BouncySushi
BouncySushi

Question is if they can post countless tweets on Israel, Ukraine why not India? Why not against terrorism? and BTW they're not indian they're American so they don't need to prove indianness, India is the world's largest consumer/young market for them which they keep milking and mint dollars....

ZippyNarwhal
ZippyNarwhal

It is better to not expect too much from cowardly NRIs and people like you.

WigglyBanana
WigglyBanana

Absolutely bro and shame on them for that Shaun Maguire of Sequoia (US Partner) is openly constantly tweeting for India

While Sundar, Satya, Vinod Khosla etc. stay shut

I understand that they cannot support a country in war. But to make a simple statements such as "We support the right to defend against terrorism"

When these powerful ex-Indians don't support us, I don't expect countries to support us.

PrancingPotato
PrancingPotato

It’s all about commercials…they don’t want to lose business in either of country. Their comments will always be construed as company stance.
On fundamentals I don’t agree with this but that’s how it if out there.
Also, India is not US (We are not that strong).
And forget about these Indian origin ceos, our sports personalities or movie stars are mum. They only tweet when they are paid. It’s all commercials.

SillyMochi
SillyMochi

What does pakistan have to give? And what will they lose in pakistan and in voicing against terrorism?

CosmicPotato
CosmicPotato

Because they are Americans. Stop putting American Indians accountable because of their origins. They only need to bother about their country technically speaking and unless India has provisions to provide dual citizenship I don't see any reason they should be involved at all.

ZestyPenguin
ZestyPenguin

Yeah they can speak on Russia Ukraine and Israel but not about their country of origin. Amazing analysis Mr Expert Number 1

CosmicLlama
CosmicLlama

Has any Indian tech ceo made a comment?.

Business leaders willl never get involved. They are too big, and their stakes are too big

SnoozyTaco
SnoozyTaco
Student10d

Yeah , the admin is dumb. How the top ceo want to involve in it. They have restrictions they can't talk anything they want.

BouncyDonut
BouncyDonut

Amrica ka dalal behand**

image
SparklyWalrus
SparklyWalrus

People need to understand the fact that they're not INDIANS, simple. IMF gave 1Bn dollars to Pakistan just yesterday, who's the chairman of the IMF, an American with Indian origin, the issue with us Indians are we, we never leave a chance to associate a success or successful person to us, and when we realise that it's just one way, we start feeling like how you're feeling. They're American, you need to understand that.

ZestyBoba
ZestyBoba

Indeed,Truth well articulated

WigglyRaccoon
WigglyRaccoon

Sundar & Nadela are US citizens, they don’t take actions which direct benefit Indian citizens.

WobblyCupcake
WobblyCupcake

And those who are not, they are waiting to become one in the USA.

ZestySushi
ZestySushi

Because Indians and Pakistanis are working under the same hood there leaving their belittled fights. Why should they build any sense of discrimination? Also the world sees the India-Pakistan war totally different from the Ukraine and Russia war.

Are you out of your mind?

SleepyCoconut
SleepyCoconut

Guys chill, go back and do something meaningful with your lives, childish argument & pointless discussion

SleepyCoconut
SleepyCoconut

Ofc, a soft dev started this thread - in BLR HSR? I bet you like travel, wear check shirts & think complying to OKR as your life goal

Discover more
Curated from across
Layoffs
by SparklyBurritoMicrosoft

Tech has failed to be a good employer; Layoffs are just one example

The economy went down? Yes. Did it affect all kinds of companies? Yes

Did the banks fire any one? No Did the Railways fire anyone? No Did the media agencies fire anyone? No

Did Large Tech companies and IT fire people? Absolute...

Top comments
user

Not the way it works. It's a function of how fast an industry grows -> The faster it is, the more you have to hire i...

user

Looks like people have taken offense to this post and want to continue to protect their tech overlords

Indian Startups
by PerkyNoodleAnalyst

The attitude among Indian tech employees

I have worked in 2 Indian-born startups, one of which has its branch in US and Europe. Almost everyday I have to reach out to folks both in India and in US to ask questions and get details regarding technical features.

Now, whenever I ...

News Discussion
by DerpyNarwhalFounder

Koo is shutting down

Another startup that could have been something had it not been for the bull market and Tiger investing unnecessarily. Over $66Mn raised, and now it's over.

Post image
Top comments
user

Copy cats. App should have been called Poo

user

They laid me off as an intern after promising PPO :(

user

What problem were they solving anyway