Nope this wont be tolerated
We let things slide too often. NOT THIS TIME. Recruiters get blamed for everything. Delayed responses. Ghosting. Rejections. Unclear communication. Fair criticism, sure. But does that justify crossing into pure filth?
YUVRAJ MUDGAL got rejected at one of the companies. Rejection email was sent - professionally, courteously. And he responded with this: "Daughter of a prosttute btch" "Get lost, motherf*cker." This is not frustration. This is pure filth. Vulgar, sexist, abusive garbage. And I refuse to let it go unchecked.
And no it cant be "a bad day" or "momentary frustration" justification.
You think rejection is unfair? Imagine how unfair it is to be met with this kind of hate for doing your job. We talk about recruiters ghosting candidates for a change, let's talk about candidates who unleash verbal violence when things don't go their way.
It's 2025, and this still happens. (and a lot goes unreported) It's 2025, and this kind of person still expects to be hired. Lets just be clear .. if you write this filth, you deserve to be named. And you will not be met with kindness. You need to be checked. You don't belong in any industry.
Hiring managers, recruiters, founders - READ THIS If you're hiring or interviewing, remember this moment. If you're building a company, you KNOW what kind of people to keep OUT. The line is drawn. And YUVRAJ MUDGAL is on the wrong side of it.
PS: if you are wondering why the company is not named, cause it was not about the company
One interview, 1000+ job opportunities
Take a 10-min AI interview to qualify for numerous real jobs auto-matched to your profile 🔑
Idk but 99% of times recruiters either ghost or don't provide a valid feedback and that creates tremendous mental pressure on candidates. Is this justified??
Stupidity ain’t justified by logic but sure can be attempted
Or maybe do your 'job' of intimating the candidates fairly?? At least tell candidates the feedback you were informed? Ghosting or not providing valid feedback isn't a solution,it's the problem. Instead of sending a generic email, how about you call them like you called them before the interview??
All I see is a well educated graduate who took so much pressure and burst out!
Was interviewed for a company last week , when I joined the call HR was there and another person in the same call they looked at the screen told " isko dekhke lagta h iska nhin hoga yaha pe , shakal se pata chal rha h " I stay silent . Then the interviewer joined the call and asked a few questions and every time he used to laugh unnecessarily in the call unnecessarily
I’ll update my recruitment team about this makes sure such email ID + name doesn’t enter our process ever. If you as recruiter can make it on LinkedIn, I’ll make sure he never gets calls from AWS, Meta, Oracle & MS as well. They will further distribute it.
Post the full thread. Can't trust one sided conversation these days
One of the recruiter from a renowned company called and abused me when I updated I won't be joining their company .
Woah What did they even think?
This is really really unfortunate, and I feel extremely bad for the person who had to receive this as part of her job.
Disgusting mindset.
What Yuvraj did is super wrong, absolutely disgusting. But, on a side note, and I’m curious to know, the email starts with providing feedback and turns into a generic canned response. Where’s the feedback?
And again not taking any sides or justifying anyone’s action but canned responses like this are the biggest reason for frustration among candidates. Not receiving a human written feedback that has the potential to help the candidate with their future prospects leaves them in a limbo and takes a toll on their mental health. Again, reiterating that Yuvraj here is wrong and must be prepared to face the consequences.
Frustration is part of the deal. Companies are not obligated to provide feedback. It's a capitalist society. We don't have do-gooders everywhere. You have every right to talk about companies not providing feedback and not apply to them.
Also a Lesson for recruiters- respond in time and do not play with emotions of candidates. Not justifying the candidates behavior though.
You got to understand recruiter doesn’t play with candidates emotions.. company does .. hiring manager does,
Recruiters should provide a timeline stating candidate should hear back from them within this timeline. What usually happens is once the hiring target is achieved, nobody cares about pipeline candidates
You have chosen to conveniently hide your name and your companys name but have shared personal information name and email of your candidate.
For all I know this image could be completely fake and plot to ruin someone's career.
I agree that the candidate didnot behave professionally at all but you should just blacklist the candidate and move on.
Sharing a company private emails can cause legal issues for you and your company.
(off topic) I just want to discuss why recruiters are either looking for early experienced 0-2 years or professional 4+ yrs... Where will those candidates who fall in the mid bracket. My friend was a data Analyst in Wipro having 2 yrs 10 months of exp but got laid off because his project ended(kind of a silent laid off). He applied in 50s of companies looking for data analyst but either they look for 0-2 or 4+ and most of the recruiters can't have a proper reasoning that why they are not proceeding and because of that he didn't have job from 6 months and that too without his any fault. Why can't recruiters give proper feedback at least to those whose profile they are checking and contacting.