QuirkyNugget
QuirkyNugget

Man of the match

Do you guys think Mohammad shami should have received the man of the match? Isn't Kohli the MVP?

21mo ago
Jobs
One interview, 1000+ job opportunities
Take a 10-min AI interview to qualify for numerous real jobs auto-matched to your profile 🔑
+322 new users this month
SwirlyRaccoon
SwirlyRaccoon
Target21mo

Kohli played good, no doubt. And yes, catches as well. But India would have easily lost by 30-50 runs hadn't shami taken those crucial wickets.

Also, for a bowler to get MoM, should he score a century as well? Or take all 10 wickets and score runs?

GoofyPenguin
GoofyPenguin

Nope, fiver in a world cup holds huge importance considering the way NZ innings came to an end. They only made 86 runs in the last 15 overs of their inning and lost 7wickets. So ideally, it was Indian bowlers who restricted them, and that role is bigger than the amazing knock that Kohli played. No disrespect but it was Shami’s day.

ZestyQuokka
ZestyQuokka
Hinge21mo

Na bro Had Shami not taken those wickets, we would have been far off from scoring these many If they had gotten Jadeja's wicket, we were done.

Discover more
Curated from across