Learning Patience and Wit After an Interview

I recently interviewed with a company where the overall experience was positive. However, the rejection reason given was rather unexpected: “You have multiple companies in your career, and we need someone with a more stable history.”

While I understand the importance of career stability, the post-COVID job market dynamics have changed significantly. Even MAANG companies have undergone layoffs and cost-cutting measures, so the reality for startups and other organizations is no different.

Throughout my career, I have seen many talented professionals, including CEOs, CTOs, and managers, forced to make difficult layoff decisions—not because they wanted to, but because circumstances demanded it. Having experienced layoffs firsthand, I can confidently say that these transitions were never due to my performance or decisions, nor were they situations I took lightly.

I have always been fully committed to every company I’ve worked with, aiming for long-term contributions. However, external factors beyond an individual’s control often shape career paths. Instead of generalizing candidates based on job tenure alone, I believe a more holistic evaluation of their experience, adaptability, and contributions is a fairer and more insightful approach.

Would love to hear thoughts from others—how do you feel about this perspective in today’s job market?