PeppyNarwhal
PeppyNarwhal

Kudos to WhatsApp for protecting user privacy🙌

User privacy is a joke here. Why on Earth you want to trace all the personal chats of the users? It’s a violation of fundamental rights of the users. Well done by WhatsApp! Read the full article: http://toi.in/Dp70hY49

Post image
13mo ago
Talking product sense with Ridhi
9 min AI interview5 questions
Round 1 by Grapevine
WigglyMochi
WigglyMochi
Oracle13mo

It feels so funny when I see that Zuck is actually trying to protect privacy😂

PeppyNarwhal
PeppyNarwhal
Swiggy13mo

Yeah, that’s so true. 😂

PerkyWalrus
PerkyWalrus
CARS2413mo

There's a difference between a court asking it and whatever you think

SnoozyJellybean
SnoozyJellybean

Apparently whatsapp seems to project itself such a nice guy, protector of the universe.

Meanwhile, when you try to share online links of products in chats or words around it, and start seeing ads on Meta. 🥲

PeppyNarwhal
PeppyNarwhal
Swiggy13mo

However that still doesn’t give government the right to get access of users chat history!

SnoozyJellybean
SnoozyJellybean

Agree, but in this case It's not the govt, it's the court.

GoofyDonut
GoofyDonut

Why on Earth you want to trace all the personal chats of the users? It’s a violation of fundamental rights of the users.

CIA/NSA/FBI: 👀

PeppyNarwhal
PeppyNarwhal
Swiggy13mo
Gif
SnoozyJellybean
SnoozyJellybean

The only remotely possible privacy thing they may have done is having disappearing messages.
But I am still not sure about that since I have worked with Backend enough to realise what soft deletes are when it comes to data records.

GoofyWaffle
GoofyWaffle
IBM13mo

You mean soft deleted msg/content is still stored? Also what is a soft delete?

SnoozyJellybean
SnoozyJellybean

Yes, basically it's a method where the record is not deleted but just a field 'deleted_at' added to the record to denote the record is deleted as per the user but the record stays in the table.

SleepyPanda
SleepyPanda

It's a publicity stunt. If you read the news articles, they're saying it's prohibitively expensive for them to do it because it'll require a lot of storage. Nowhere do they say it's to protect users' privacy. That's only given as headlines

PeppyBanana
PeppyBanana

The government asking for this shows how controlling and insecure they are. And of course, the media won't touch this story.

PeppyNarwhal
PeppyNarwhal
Swiggy13mo

This is exactly what most people fail to understand!

SillyDumpling
SillyDumpling

sure they'll leave their biggest market for our privacy... sure

FloatingJellybean
FloatingJellybean

This is double standard of whatsapp. For US they have submitted the private key and for India they are playing this drama

DerpyBoba
DerpyBoba
InMobi13mo

Exactly! Only one allowed to read whatsapp messages is Meta

GoofyMochi
GoofyMochi

Zuckerberg is class A moron. He says he is fighting for user privacy in India, but on the other hand he has nothing to say about this: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-votes-renew-fisa-spying-tool-earlier-republican-revolt-rcna147557

Seems like double standards to me

Discover more
Curated from across