SillyJellybean
SillyJellybean

Khalistan this Khalistan that

But do you even know why Khalistan movement started in the first place? Do you know what the Anandpur sahib resolution was?

Yes
No
109 votesexpired
25mo ago
Jobs
One interview, 1000+ job opportunities
Take a 10-min AI interview to qualify for numerous real jobs auto-matched to your profile 🔑
+322 new users this month
TwirlyBagel
TwirlyBagel
Dunzo25mo

Creation of state you mean Haryana and Himachal where there was 0 development before state creation because they were not that Punjabis and deserve no resources. Till this date Haryana didn't get a single drop of Satluj.

SillyJellybean
SillyJellybean

Do you seriously think sharing of Chandigarh as capital between two states is a good idea?

GroovyBoba
GroovyBoba

Moving it is resource intensive, and the important cities like gurgaon, faridabad don't care where the capital is

SleepyRaccoon
SleepyRaccoon
Oracle25mo

Don't know don't care

SillyJellybean
SillyJellybean

I guess you're still young

SwirlyKoala
SwirlyKoala

Resolution is just one sided list of demands by party which lost badly 1972 to gain some traction. On resource sharing, no body is happy in sharing resource, neither south which is subsidizing the north nor salary class which is subsidizing farmers, nor Punjab which is sharing water. Very difficult to come to even conclusion on division without a proper study. Hence this point cannot be even catered in public polls/posts.

TwirlyBagel
TwirlyBagel
Dunzo25mo

Punjab doesn't share water with any state.

SillyJellybean
SillyJellybean

If you voted no, please go read more about anandpur sahib resolution.

Khalistan was never about being a completely independent country. India has made many mistakes in the creation of its states and allocation of resources, and continues to do so till today which pisses people off.

Punjab has always needed more water because it has always produced a major chunk of our crop, for example. It's literally called the food basket of India for a reason.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anandpur_Sahib_Resolution

TwirlyCupcake
TwirlyCupcake
Gitlab25mo

Whatever that is, India isn't for Sikh rashtra, Hindu rashtra, Muslim rashtra etc.

SillyJellybean
SillyJellybean

Agreed, but secessionists don't just go away. Just look at J&K protests, Ladakh wants statehood too. In the north east we still have AFSPA. Other regions also want statehood like chhattisgarh and uttarakhand.

These demands come because of resource misallocation and historical injustices. I'm sure Hindus cannot imagine Ram mandir getting bombed by tanks but that's what happened in Amritsar not too long ago.

Need to look beyond labels and address core problems.

QuirkyCoconut
QuirkyCoconut

W community

Discover more
Curated from across