He was self taught researcher.
If u look at it, and take humanity as a whole... It is self taught as well :)
No comparison ofcourse, but Newton was one too and many others, so what's your point?
Don't mind but I think I would take Stanford's definition over what you think what a scientist is.
I am not against Stanford, but I am surprised I don't know how many times SC directed Patanjali to issue a public apology, he's the one who was involved in the recent Uttrakhand Tender Fraud....
He's the one who mocked Covid vaccines & Scientists curing Covid....
What's matter if you can do something like them, then can become scientist too, this post feel like why you are jealousy or mocking people. Giving label by stanford won't help him with anything like in resume for hiring, why do we even look at this or take seriously 🤔?
It is based on publication with some garbage results where they tops it. He will get admitted to AIIMMS even for cold cough but wont use Patanjali product. Thats the kind of ayurvedic scientist we have and moreover educated people just want to be proud of the fact that it aligns with there culture...
