

Genuinely tried to understand Islam, ended up feeling even more conflicted.
Hi everyone, This is going to be a long read. I'm sharing this with a mix of curiosity, confusion and maybe even a little frustration. I'm hoping to get honest perspectives from Indian women here..especially if you've interacted with people from different religions, cultures and mindsets.
So, to give some background: I was born in a Hindu family who isn't religious at all. The only time we do Pooja is on Diwali. And while l've always identified as secular and open-minded, l've also grown up hearing stories-some firsthand, some from extended family-about the patriarchal tendencies and gender restrictions in Islam. I've never quite known what to make of it. I did my schooling in india but never felt comfortable enough to ask questions. I worried I might offend someone or get misunderstood. Still, the doubts lingered. What if
l've been fed a biased narrative?
What if the truth is more nuanced?
That curiosity led me to join an Indian Muslim Discord server, just to understand their perspective. To be fair, the server members were mostly polite and welcoming. They told me the server is mostly fun and gave me names of people to talk to regarding religion, tech and politics. One of them had already DM'd me.
Our conversation was long and parts of it felt respectful and thoughtful. But the more we talked, the more I noticed undertones of gender essentialism and rigid moral frameworks. It started with him saying that if he knew I was a woman, he wouldn't have messaged me privately not because it's forbidden, but out of "respect."
He said Islam teaches men to give double respect to women over men. And while I appreciate kindness, that already felt off to me. Why double? Why not just equal respect for all humans?
He said: "How do we treat everyone the same when God did not create us the same?" "Equality is not fair. Equity is."
At first, l agreed- men and women are biologically different.
But then he compared gender roles to lions and lionesses in nature, emphasizing fixed, divinely assigned roles.
According to him, women staying at home and being "protected" is divine order. Men must provide. Women must be modest and "precious like diamonds" who belong in safes..not my analogy, his.
He made a passionate case for modesty, citing Qur'an verses where men are also told to lower their gaze and behave. He condemned ogling, flirting, and "crotch-hugging pants" on men too. Which, okay, sure..sounds progressive on paper. But then it quickly spiraled into justifications for burgas and the "don't tempt men" logic.
I mentioned my school friend whose father forced her to wear a burga, even though she hated it and found it suffocating. His reply was, "Her parents didn't explain it with love. If she saw the beauty of modesty, she wouldn't feel burdened."
But... isn't that the entire problem? If you have to wear something, if you're socially conditioned or emotionally manipulated to believe it's your "duty," is it really a choice? l asked him straight: "Why does your God create women beautiful and then punish them for showing it?" He dodged, said modesty lies in character, not just cloth. Then conveniently blamed countries like Iran for all the abuse, saying they don't follow real Islam.
The minute you bring up hijab morality police, beatings ano death for non-compliance..it's "not Islam." But when you praise women for "choosing" modesty, suddenly it is Islam. He casual referenced to "dogs of hell" and a prophet's V supposed quote about killing extremists wherever you 1..... them. I was shocked. The same man who talked about love and beauty was now quoting instructions to kill. At some point, I asked the big question: "Is Islam patriarchal?"
He casual referenced to "dogs of hell" and a prophet's supposed quote about killing extremists wherever you find them. I was shocked. The same man who talked about love and beauty was now quoting instructions to kill. At some point, l asked the big question: "Is Islam patriarchal?" He dodged that too. Help me unpack this. I'm not here to bash Muslims or Islam. I'm here to understand. But here are my takeaways so far:
- Women are praised, but also boxed in. "You're so precious, we lock you in safes." I'm sorry but is that love or possession?
- Modesty is supposedly a mutual obligation, but only women are punished when they fail to conform. Even when men are the problem, women are told to hide and be careful.
- Agency is theoretical. If the choice is between obeying and being shamed or hurt, then it's not a real choice.
- Responsibility for male behavior is quietly shifted to women. "Men will ogle." "Protect yourself." "Don't tempt." Instead of just teaching men self-control and accountability.
- Patriarchy is rebranded as divine design. It's natural. It's in our biology. It's beautiful. (But somehow always ends with women having fewer freedoms.)
I know Hinduism is not free from its flaws..don't get me wrong. It's got casteism, sati history, dowry pressure, temple misogyny and more. But at least now we can question it openly. Reinterpret. Reform. Protest.
With Islam, every criticism is met with "You misunderstood" or "that's not true Islam."
So... where does the truth live?
If you're a Muslim, I'd love to hear your experience. Do you really feel empowered? Do you feel free to question your faith without fear? Do all Muslim women wear the hijab/ burga by choice or conditioning?
If you're not Muslim, what has your experience been interacting with Muslim men or communities? Have you felt like you're treated equally? Or patronized under the garb of respect?
Is this conversation even safe to have in India anymore v Or are we all just expected to swallow our discomfort so no one gets offended? I'm genuinely confused. And I want to understand what other women here think. Thank you for reading.
Talking product sense with Ridhi
9 min AI interview5 questions

Kya b*di hai ye!! You put so much effort just to understand that Islam, like any other religion is patriarchal, misogynistic and orthodox!! 🤷♂️ In fact it is more orthodox and rigid than others.
All religions are bad, religions enslave you, and block and suppress independent thinking. And all religions are suppressive of women, some more some less. The moment any ideology starts enforcing and commanding to do certain things in specific way, that’s the moment it starts going downhill.
Read OSHO’s viewpoints on religions. And you can read BR Ambedkar’s Book too (Pakistan, or the partition of India), where he has written a lot against both Hinduism as well as Islam.

- “You're so precious, we lock you in safes.” Is that love or possession?
Islamic perspective: This analogy is often misused. Islam does not view women as possessions but as honored individuals. The emphasis on protection stems from value, not control. Just as valuable items are safeguarded, Islam encourages respectful boundaries—not confinement. Women in Islam had and still have roles as scholars, businesswomen, leaders, and warriors. The goal isn't restriction, but dignity, safety, and mutual respect in public and private life.
- Modesty is supposedly mutual, but women are punished more.
Islamic perspective: You're right that modesty is for both men and women. The Qur'an first commands men to lower their gaze and be modest (Surah An-Nur 24:30) before addressing women (24:31). If societies enforce modesty unequally, that's a cultural issue—not an Islamic one. Islam emphasizes justice and accountability for both genders. Any community that punishes women disproportionately is not truly following the balanced Islamic approach.
- “Obey or be shamed or hurt” — is that real agency?
Islamic perspective: Islam values choice. Faith itself is not valid unless it is chosen: “There is no compulsion in religion” (Qur’an 2:256). If someone is being forced, shamed, or harmed for their choices, that is oppression—not Islam. Real Islamic ethics demand that people act sincerely, not out of fear. Agency matters deeply in Islam, both spiritually and socially.
- “Men will ogle”—so women must adjust. What about teaching men self-control?
Islamic perspective: Absolutely agreed. Islam starts by telling men to control their eyes and desires (again, Qur’an 24:30). The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) taught men to lower their gaze and respect women deeply. Blaming women for men’s behavior is unjust and un-Islamic. Each person is accountable for their own actions. Men are not excused—Islam expects them to rise to a higher standard.
- Patriarchy rebranded as divine design? Why do women still have fewer freedoms?
Islamic perspective: Islam recognizes differences in gender, but not in worth or value. “Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you” (Qur’an 49:13). Yes, traditional roles exist, but so do rights: the right to education, to own property, to work, to choose marriage, to inherit. If these rights are restricted, that’s often due to cultural patriarchy, not Islamic law. Islam gave women rights 1400 years ago that were denied elsewhere until recently.
In summary: Your concerns are valid and reflect injustices that sometimes happen in Muslim-majority societies—but those are often due to culture, misinterpretation, or misuse of religion. Islam, in its original and ideal form, promotes justice, balance, dignity, and accountability for all.

-
OP's point is still valid. The statement is actually trying to overcompensate for the lack of rights and freedom of women in the religion. Then it gets twisted even further saying that we give permission to our women to work and what not.
-
Have a look into 2:282. One male witness is equal to two women witnesses and it further states that two are required since one might forget. This blatantly shows that the translations have been manipulated to mitigate direct discrimination. Why can't men forget? This is one of the many instances where women are treated less than a man. Also yes, this is common sense if one gender is supposed to cover their entire body and the other is not.
-
Pretty convenient of you to point that out. What is the punishment for apostasy in Islam? And there are multiple instances of spreading fear in the hearts of people reading the Quran to follow one true entity, otherwise there'll be consequences. There's no choice in Islam, there's compulsion and then Stockholm syndrome.
-
Oh boy is this a good one? I have mentioned a resembling argument in the third point but yeah. The same verse says something very generic like "what appears to be normal". What does that mean? Even hijab could be not normal at certain places, the women should do what in that case to avoid gaze?
-
Let's not even start on this. "Never will succeed such a nation as makes a woman their ruler." What was this said by?
In summary Islam does a lot of things that are not perfect to which I have a list of. But just using common sense, it falls apart pretty instantly. The sharia and the teachings being imparted on the people has a negative impact and if a religion is so easy to manipulate and misinterpret, I don't think the foundations are that sturdy.

Also I think you had a conversation with some gpt to come up with these arguments.

Abbey Sharam kar Reddit se copy kiya hai

I can post in two places:)
Islam is just a lifestyle choice given the shallowness with which muslims all over the world practice it.
Over enthusiastic lads will only be able to tell you their perspective which is highly influenced by their environment or the people they've learned from
Abrahamic religions have a long history and and islam definitely is interesting. I ask questions and some questions about patriarchy is definitely guy wrenching.
There is a stark contrast when you read about God and his traits but when suddenly you see a sentence that sends you dizzy. Then you disbelieve but some spark comes someday and you realise that gut wrench was a result of your own shallow interpretations of a sentence and then you begin asking more
And everytime it hits slower but you are not able to make anything of your thought
*gut wrenching

Thank you for sharing this there’s something deeply relatable in what you said about the “gut-wrench” feeling followed by moments of clarity (or further confusion). I agree that interpretation plays a huge role, and sometimes it’s hard to tell whether a particular discomfort is due to our own limited understanding, or whether it’s pointing to a deeper issue that should be questioned.
What’s been toughest for me is that whenever I try to explore or voice this discomfort, the response often swings to two extremes either outright dismissal (“you misunderstood”) or blind justification (“this is divine design”). That grey space, where doubt and honest curiosity live, doesn’t feel safe to explore.
I want to keep asking, though. I don’t know if I’ll ever find answers that fully settle everything, but I’m learning to sit with the discomfort instead of suppressing it. And comments like yours help it’s good to know I’m not the only one who’s felt that internal tug-of-war.
Patriarchy and misogyny have always been passed on to generations after generations irrespective of the region or the religion.
Religion is anyway a means to divide people 😑.
Some are accommodating enough to accept changes and reforms and some aren't.
Also, having been friends with/coworker to Muslim people, I believe not all the people who follow Islam have a regressive attitude. But yes, I agree that some of their teachings do not hold any meaning in the current world, just like the case with other religions for that matter.
Regarding wearing burqa or hijaab, it should be a personal choice, ideally. But I agree with your view that many girls are conditioned in a way to "choose" wearing it.
Anyways, I strongly believe one should take away the positive and meaningful teachings from one or many religions and practice those.

Thank you for this nuanced and balanced perspective. I really appreciate you acknowledging that patriarchal systems exist across regions and religions it’s not about singling out one faith but trying to understand the real-world implications of certain teachings and how they’re interpreted.
You hit the nail on the head with the idea of conditioning that’s the part I keep coming back to. When a “choice” is so deeply shaped by cultural or familial pressure, is it truly a free choice? And yet, from the outside, it often gets presented as empowerment, which makes it harder to question.
Also agree with you that not all Muslims are regressive I’ve known kind, progressive Muslim friends and colleagues too. But the tension between personal practice and institutional doctrine is something that really stood out to me in this exploration.
Your final point really resonates: if we can hold on to what’s meaningful and discard what no longer serves us or harms others, that’s the ideal. It’s just… some systems seem more open to reform than others, and that’s where the discomfort lies.

Excellent, thoughtful post, OP.
All your questions are on point. It seems to me that you already have the answers to your own questions, and either not fully ready to accept them or just uncomfortable about confronting the truth.
To keep it concise, religion—any religion— is just a means of control, varying only in degree. The parts of them that are enriching or have genuinely profound ideas, you can entertain and learn from those independently, without subscribing wholesale to any one religion.
Speaking of Islam specifically—if everyone's equal, why did god choose the prophet to spread his teachings, and why not anyone else? Why not a woman, since they're supposedly worthy of "double" the respect (whatever that's supposed to mean)?
I'd recommend checking out Vimoh's channel on YouTube, you may find answers (and more questions!) there. Good luck :)
PS: I'm not a woman; only responded because I thought I had something useful to contribute.

Thank you for such a thoughtful response and you’re right, I think part of my conflict does come from not wanting certain answers to be true, or at least wishing the truth were more comforting. It’s incredibly hard to untangle what’s cultural, what’s scriptural, and what’s interpretation passed off as divine will.
I really resonate with what you said about taking the enriching parts of a religion without subscribing to the whole package. That’s something I’ve been considering more lately whether I can engage with spiritual ideas without having to adopt the institutional framework that comes with them.
Your question about why a prophet was even needed and why not a woman is so on point. If divinity is fair and just, why would the conduit of truth be so narrowly defined? Especially when women are simultaneously called “precious” and yet denied that kind of agency or leadership?
I’ll definitely check out Vimoh’s channel, thanks for the recommendation.

@everyone @shpinq
just one comment why do so much love freedom and independence?
What if dependency is what makes us human?
and if that's the constraint in life and that meant people across religions had some set notions about gender, which btw are very similar, then how about we accept them.
Let me give you a very extreme example: if majority of a group says that this road is haunted, this hike is dangerous, this lifestyle is wrong.. you get the drill... then why are we always trying to question it and intend to actually do exactly the opposite?

Nahh, I don’t get the drill. It is not about doing anything “opposite”, it is just doing what one feels rational, scientific and more logic. Herd mentality is never good. Humans advance by virtue of curiosity, and experimental analysis, not by doing what majority does.
“Dependency is what makes us human”? What kind of ludicrous statement is that! 🤦♂️

Yes :) the so called logic that we have been moving towards since days of Plato and especially after Renaissance.
Imo, the dynamics of the world is beyond science. As a nugget, many scientists end up adopting faith.
The rational, scientific choice is a very modern notion. The principle of false unless proven, is the biggest fallacy. For eg. aliens don't exist. If you can't prove today, and it gets proven in future then? All I am asking is to be more human,not some cold,calculative person but willing to accept mistakes and still forgive. We still have choices to choose irrational and emotions over science. The future may not give the same luxury to our generations.

I read maybe 1/3rd till the lioness context and till that the Muslim guy is correct. Stop doing, baal ki khaal. Any religion is about oneness with God, name any. This is the jist.

They treat women the same no difference between wife and sister.
If you are so curious to learn Islam first start with your own religion.


(Rant) Why are most women least bothered about men's mental health ?
I grew up with 5 sisters (1 real and 4 cousin), I am aware about the pain and the tribulation that women go through and have always been supporting women in general.
I was shocked to see the opposite when I stepped into the real world. ...


And these so called feminists talk about dowries all the time. What hypocrisy.

Why the f she wanted maintenance? Doesn't her profile say CEO and blah blah blah... 🙄

What’s wrong with our Society? Tragic Loss: Rape and murder of a Dr
The initial autopsy indicated that the victim was murdered after being sexually assaulted.
Why people think that they can get away with such heinous crime? Perhaps it’s because of the lack of stricter punishment for such crimes or slow...
