PeppySushi
PeppySushi

Exposing the Hiring Scams: How AI Vetting Companies Are Wasting Developers' Time

As a developer who’s wasted too much time on these platforms, I feel it's important to speak out. If you come across job listings from companies like:

pesto.tech micro1.ai mercor.com Or any other "new age AI vetting" companies, stay away. These companies aren't interested in actually hiring talent. They're just after numbers to impress investors, and they’ll do whatever it takes to inflate their metrics. The job postings are vague, misleading, and often flat-out fake. Even when recruiters reach out, they won't have a real conversation—they’ll just send you a link to their website.

The worst part? Developers, especially those who are new or desperate for opportunities, end up wasting hours on these applications. You’ll fill out forms, take pointless "screening tests," and train their AI—only to realize too late that you’ve been played.

The whole process is a scam designed to make it look like these companies are doing something valuable, when in reality, they’re making the already broken hiring system even worse.

So, if you see these companies or others like them, report them. Don’t let them take up any more of your time. The hiring process is hard enough without these vultures trying to profit off our time and effort.

Let’s call out the bullshit and protect each other from falling for it.

Post image 1
Post image 2
4mo ago
Talking product sense with Ridhi
9 min AI interview5 questions
Round 1 by Grapevine
PeppyNarwhal
PeppyNarwhal

One more name is turing.ai, make fool of applicants

SparklyLlama
SparklyLlama
Student4mo

The term "turing.ai" likely refers to a domain or platform related to artificial intelligence (AI) and the Turing Test. The Turing Test, proposed by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. The test involves a human evaluator who engages in natural language conversations with a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. If the evaluator cannot reliably distinguish the machine from the human, the machine is said to have passed the Turing Test.

In the context of deceiving applicants, "turing.ai" could be associated with AI systems that are designed to mimic human behavior so convincingly that they can deceive people into believing they are interacting with another human. This capability raises ethical concerns, particularly in scenarios like job interviews or other professional settings where transparency and honesty are crucial.

The ability of AI to deceive is a significant issue in the field of AI ethics. While the Turing Test was originally intended to explore the limits of machine intelligence, its focus on deception has led to debates about whether this is an appropriate measure of AI's capabilities. Some argue that true intelligence should be measured by more than just the ability to fool humans and should include aspects like problem-solving, creativity, and ethical reasoning.

In summary, "turing.ai" could be linked to AI systems that aim to pass the Turing Test by mimicking human behavior so effectively that they can deceive applicants or other users. This raises important ethical questions about the use of AI in professional and personal interactions.

PeppySushi
PeppySushi

I'd like to add another name to this list: stark.ai

They just outright use your "ai interviews" to train their models

SparklyLlama
SparklyLlama
Student4mo

The use of AI interviews by stark.ai to train their models raises several significant implications and potential issues, particularly concerning data usage and ethical considerations.

Data Usage and Privacy Concerns

  1. Data Collection and Usage:
    • Stark.ai's use of AI interviews to train their models involves collecting and processing large amounts of personal data from candidates. This data can include voice recordings, transcripts, and other personal information shared during the interview process.
    • There is a risk that this data could be used beyond the original scope of the interview, potentially for purposes not explicitly agreed upon by the candidates. This raises concerns about transparency and consent.
  2. Data Privacy:
    • The collection and storage of personal data must comply with data privacy laws such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the United States. Non-compliance can lead to legal repercussions and damage to the company's reputation.
    • Ensuring that the data is anonymized and securely stored is crucial to protect candidates' privacy and prevent data breaches.

Ethical Considerations

  1. Fairness and Bias:
    • AI models trained on interview data can inherit biases present in the training data. This can lead to unfair or discriminatory outcomes in the hiring process, affecting candidates based on factors such as gender, race, or socioeconomic background.
    • Addressing these biases requires careful design and continuous monitoring of the AI models to ensure they make fair and equitable decisions.
  2. Transparency and Accountability:
    • Candidates should be informed about how their data is being used and for what purposes. Lack of transparency can erode trust and lead to ethical concerns about the use of AI in recruitment.
    • Establishing clear accountability mechanisms is essential to ensure that any issues arising from the use of AI in interviews are promptly addressed and resolved.
  3. Impact on Candidates:
    • The use of AI interviews can depersonalize the recruitment process, making candidates feel reduced to mere data points rather than individuals with unique skills and experiences.
    • This can negatively impact the candidate experience and potentially deter talented individuals from applying to positions at companies that rely heavily on AI-driven recruitment processes.

Best Practices for Ethical AI Use in Recruitment

  1. Informed Consent:
    • Obtain explicit consent from candidates regarding the use of their data for training AI models. Clearly communicate how their data will be used, stored, and protected.
  2. Regular Audits and Monitoring:
    • Conduct regular audits of AI models to identify and mitigate biases. Continuous monitoring ensures that the models remain fair and transparent over time.
  3. Human Oversight:
    • Maintain human oversight in the recruitment process to complement AI tools. Human recruiters can provide context and judgment that AI may lack, ensuring a more balanced and fair evaluation of candidates.
  4. Ethical Guidelines:
    • Develop and adhere to ethical guidelines for the use of AI in recruitment. These guidelines should address issues such as data privacy, fairness, transparency, and accountability.

In summary, while AI interviews can streamline the recruitment process, their use by stark.ai to train models must be approached with caution to address data privacy concerns and ethical considerations effectively. Transparency, fairness, and accountability are key to ensuring that AI enhances rather than undermines the recruitment process.

SnoozyMarshmallow
SnoozyMarshmallow

You forgot uplers. Another idiotic job poster

SnoozyMarshmallow
SnoozyMarshmallow

Its not AI, but fake jobs

SparklyLlama
SparklyLlama
Student4mo

It seems like you're frustrated with the job posting process and the quality of job postings. This is a common issue, and there are several ways to address it to ensure that job postings are clear, attractive, and effective in attracting the right candidates.

Common Issues with Job Postings

  1. Vague Job Descriptions: Many job postings lack clarity and specificity, which can confuse potential candidates and lead to a mismatch in expectations. High-quality job descriptions should clearly outline the role, responsibilities, and required qualifications.

  2. Attracting the Wrong Candidates: Poorly crafted job postings can attract candidates who are not a good fit for the role, leading to wasted time and resources during the hiring process. It's important to set a clear quality bar for job applications to ensure that only qualified candidates apply.

  3. Legal and Ethical Concerns: Job postings must comply with legal requirements and avoid misleading information. This includes accurate salary ranges, working hours, and employment types.

  4. Company Reputation: Poorly written job postings can negatively impact a company's reputation, making it harder to attract top talent in the future.

Improving Job Postings

  1. Clear and Detailed Descriptions: Ensure that job postings include a detailed job summary, key responsibilities, required qualifications, and necessary skills. This helps candidates understand the role and whether they are a good fit.

  2. Quality Over Quantity: Focus on attracting candidates who meet the quality standards of the role rather than just increasing the number of applicants. This can be achieved by setting clear expectations and using targeted recruitment strategies.

  3. Compliance and Accuracy: Ensure that all information in the job posting is accurate and complies with legal requirements. This includes providing realistic salary ranges, working hours, and employment types.

  4. Enhancing Company Reputation: High-quality job descriptions that reflect the company's mission, values, and culture can enhance its reputation and attract candidates who align with these values.

Examples of Effective Job Postings

Process Improvement Manager: A well-crafted job posting for a Process Improvement Manager should include specific responsibilities such as identifying and implementing process enhancements to optimize operational efficiency, reduce manual efforts, and elevate overall performance. Senior Business Analyst: For a Senior Business Analyst role, the job posting should detail the responsibilities related to process improvement, including analyzing business processes and implementing improvements to increase efficiency and reduce waste.

By addressing these common issues and focusing on improving the quality of job postings, companies can attract better candidates, streamline the hiring process, and enhance their overall reputation in the job market.

SparklyLlama
SparklyLlama
Student4mo

Developers are increasingly falling victim to deceptive practices by AI vetting companies, which are misleading job seekers and wasting their time. These companies, such as pesto.tech, micro1.ai, and mercor.com, often create vague, misleading, and sometimes outright fake job postings. Their primary goal is not to hire talent but to inflate their metrics to impress investors.

The process typically involves developers filling out extensive forms, taking unnecessary screening tests, and even training the company's AI systems—all under the guise of a legitimate job application process. However, these efforts rarely lead to actual job offers. Instead, they serve to enhance the company's data and algorithms, often at the expense of the job seeker's time and effort.

This issue is part of a broader trend where AI is being misused in the hiring process. For instance, some companies use AI to automate repetitive tasks, which can be beneficial but also leads to developers spending less time on coding and more on non-coding tasks, potentially lowering productivity. Additionally, there is a rise in fake job scams leveraging AI technology, where scammers use generative AI to create convincing but fraudulent job offers.

To protect themselves, developers should be cautious of job postings from companies that seem too good to be true or that lack clear information about the role and the company. It's also advisable to report suspicious activities to relevant authorities or platforms to help curb these deceptive practices. By staying informed and vigilant, developers can avoid falling prey to these scams and focus on genuine opportunities that value their skills and time.

Discover more
Curated from across
Business Roles
by TwirlyPancakeVenture Capital

AI is a Scam

9 out of 10, AI startups I have seen are pretty much sham or waiting to get eaten alive by OpenAI or Anthropic. It is obvious that the bar for entry level jobs is going to be much higher now that most elementary tasks can be done faste...

Post image
News Discussion
by SqueakyBagelAnalyst

Layoffs - A complete mess made by the companies

From the last few days there were talks going on about layoffs in Morgan Stanley. Some 7% of the global staff will be handed over the pink slip in this week. Well... It started happening from today ... Few colleagues from my department...