I think you only get better at interviews by preparing for interviews. It's a decent measure of IQ and work ethic.
However, I have met PMs who kill it at interviews but are extremely incompetent at their jobs. I have also met great PMs who really suck at interviews.
As the role evolves and AI takes over, is there a better way to evaluate PMs?
Unsure of what can be done better but I can confidently say given my first hand experience that
a. Being great at interviews doesn't guarantee being great at job b. Being from IIMs doesn't guarantee shit. I have worked with counterparts from best of IIMs and some of them are dumb as fuck.
Took the words from my mouth 😁
Lately I have been giving interviews for APM/PM roles, it seems interviewers are looking more on how well you can solve a guesstimate/product design question than what you have done in the past, has anyone gone through a similar phase? ...
How does someone with 0 background in AI have enough knowledge to clear interview rounds at a company primarily into AI?
Also, what kind of skills should I expect to put to use (barring the usual PM skills) to be a great PM in that spac...
Does anyone else feel like the PM interview process is easily scammable? I feel like 80% of it is a vibe check and 20% is the actual content itself. Am a PM with 3 YoE and have been interviewing around recently. I have 0 preparation for ...
