GigglyUnicorn
GigglyUnicorn

Candidate NPS is a vanity metric. Period.

Most companies think they're crushing it on "candidate experience" because they send out a shiny little post-interview survey.

  • How was your interview?
  • Did you like our process?
  • Would you recommend us? And then what??? You slap a score on a dashboard and call it a win. Reality is : That score means nothing. Only you and your groupies felt good.

Why? Because the only metric that matters is whether candidates trust you enough to come back. Trust you enough to recommend their friends. Trust you enough to bet their career on you.

And you know what's wild? Most of you aren’t even asking the hard questions:

  • Did we respect their time?
  • Did we communicate at the right time with the right insights that matters to them?
  • Did we show them a process that reflects the values we SO SO SO preach in our job posts?

Candidate experience isn't about what candidates feel in the moment. It's about how they feel about you months or days later - after they've been ghosted, rejected, or onboarded.

If your candidate experience score is high, but your reapply rate is low, you're living in a fantasy. Candidate experience isn't a survey. Period.

If you are too married to the game, thinking Oh you know what - I got it all figured - here's the only question that should matter (to you as a recruiter, to you as a hiring manager, to you as a leader): Would I trust the same process if I were on the other side of the table? Do not answer too soon. Your biases will show. Take time. Mull over it.

With that said - I got to ask - What's that one thing you would change about candidate experience in an/your org today? I am looking for inputs from Hiring managers, Founders and Candidates/ Job Seekers.

7mo ago
Jobs
One interview, 1000+ job opportunities
Take a 10-min AI interview to qualify for numerous real jobs auto-matched to your profile 🔑
+322 new users this month
CosmicLlama
CosmicLlama

Anything done by the HR is useless. Are those employee survey worth it?

The HR serves the same purpose that the army of "assistants" that politicians/movie stars have around them. These assistants create a scene walking just ahead of their "boss". They are just for show off.

GigglyUnicorn
GigglyUnicorn

Here’s a suggestion that would make more sense - Give me an objective sentence backing your opinion without using pseudo judgemental verbiage - right now I see nothing more than a bunch of loose opinionated words stitched together.

Discover more
Curated from across
Confessions
by GigglyUnicornHuman Resource

Questions every Talent Leader should ask themselves

  • Do you know what each recruiter is working on and the daily challenges the recruiters face, beyond the weekly/ quarterly numbers? Can you name three specific obstacles your recruiters face with hiring managers right now?
  • Are you buil...
Product Managers
by GigglyLlamaGeneralist

Rant about recruitment in startups

Hello people, We are building a recruitment platform to make hiring easy and fun. Having worked with a recruitment startup, we weren't able to hire for our own team. Hire first, fire faster mode ON tha humara.

So, we found this gap most...

Indian Startups
by PerkyNoodleAnalyst

Don't bother interview with AccelData

This was my pathetic interview experience with Acceldata india with a very unprofessional and lying recruiter. This story has a satisfying ending.

I attended 6 rounds of interviews in 1 month and completed a take home assignment. I cl...

Top comments
user

This is EXACTLY one of the ways this platform is meant to be used. Call out the BS and NAME THE DAMN COMPANY. Dodged ...

user

This person knows how to keep a reader hooked. Interview more and share all experiences 🙌

user

Similar story a top Indian listed fintech did to me back in 2022. After 7 rounds with three different teams, HR said ...