MagicalBagel
MagicalBagel

As the comment says, want more output? Increase the input, simple.

Just yesterday I took an auto ride on nammayatri. The driver was very chatty and towards the end of the trip, when I paid 164 for the ride, he said, if this was ola they would have taken 40% and given me the meter rate of 90. Big words from the ceo whose company charges this level of margin on people who are trying to make ends meet. Driver said he doesn’t use uber or ola anymore, since the launch of namma yatri.

Post image
28mo ago
Jobs
One interview, 1000+ job opportunities
Take a 10-min AI interview to qualify for numerous real jobs auto-matched to your profile 🔑
+322 new users this month
SillyMochi
SillyMochi

Nothing wrong with it

MagicalBagel
MagicalBagel

Yes sir you said the same on the narayana murthy post earlier and got ratioed

SillyMochi
SillyMochi

Chill hai, it’s same post here as well

ZoomyMuffin
ZoomyMuffin

Chomu hai dono. In 2023, it's bad economics.

  1. 70hr workweek leaves less time for enjoying for youngsters, which means less spending. Most people with surplus money are stuck in jobs that don't allow them to spend it in economy and even reduce the multiplier effect. If you want to increase incomes across the board, those incomes need to flow down which only happens when consumption is strong.

  2. Automation, AI has increased. Time at work won't help or make you competitive as much as reskilling or investments at workplace would. Murthy shud rather invest in a lot of nocode technologies and revamping legacy codes in his clients offices which haven't been touched because every generation of coders has procrastinated the revamp.

FluffyNugget
FluffyNugget
Swiggy28mo

Ofcourse the most toxic ceo ka baap bhavish is supporting this 😄

SillyMochi
SillyMochi

Oops

MagicalQuokka
MagicalQuokka

As if we have been working any less than the world already. Such a dumb proposition.

The thing we have a shortage of (compared to the leading countries) is great leadership who can build businesses that compete globally, not working hours.

Brute force working hours aren't going to make any meaningful impact - but that will definitely make Mr. Murthy and others even wealthier at the expense of the employees.

MagicalBagel
MagicalBagel

True

QuirkyNoodle
QuirkyNoodle

Isn’t it a bit too convenient for CEOs to be making such statements? Sure, they’d work 70 hours a week because they’re getting the most out of it. Incentivise your team to work as hard, and maybe they would too. Don’t expect people to work extra hours without extra compensation when you yourself would charge a bomb for even an hour of your time.

SwirlyPancake
SwirlyPancake
Amazon28mo

The breed raises its head again - Murthy, Bhavish, Pritlstyn care founder, Shantanu Deshpande. It laughable though when Murthy says this while his legacy is a sweatshop

SnoozyLlama
SnoozyLlama
Apna28mo

Infosys making us realise why cracking a good company during placements is important 😃

GroovyWaffle
GroovyWaffle

I don’t think most people would be able to improve their productivity (let alone double it) if the pay is doubled. The premise itself is wrong. We are very adept at doing pretend work which adds no value but seems like a lot of tasks. As the saying goes, the work expands to fill the time a person has.

For infosys, it makes sense for employees to work 70 hours a week. Many learn directly on the job/project, and infy could improve the delivery times if they spend time. They benefit with better skills and faster promotions. That’s not a template for everyone.

But doubling input giving double output betrays a lack of understanding of how maths works or how people work.

CosmicDumpling
CosmicDumpling

Ola does have input but their output keeps breaking

Discover more
Curated from across